Latest News // Tips

Test

by admin ~ May 9th, 2011

Test


Hippys

by admin ~ May 11th, 2010

They Stink

Constitutional Scholar Obama? –Not so much

by admin ~ April 4th, 2010

I’m not even going to give this analysis and just put it there in its entirety–

The Examiner:

In what is being called ‘the biggest hustle in human history,‘ a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama’s resume, including the outright lie that he was a ‘Constitutional scholar and professor.’

The claim turns out to be false.

As investigators delve further into the background of Barack Obama, a disturbing picture is emerging of a man who is not who he claims to be. The information the public has been told concerning Obama is turning out to be false–fabrications and inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that had clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the land.

According to a special report issued by ‘the Blogging Professor,’ the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama. The report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a ‘constitutional professor and scholar,’ and that he never served as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the school.

The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an ‘instructor’ at Chicago Law School, not a professor. Commonly, instructors are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.

In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors is below that of associate professors and professors because they lack the credentials.

In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history in higher education are a complete sham. The President of the United States is a complete fraud.

According to Doug Ross:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Thus, the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor of the Harvard Law Review a ‘put-up job’ as well, allowing the student to claim he held this prestigious position without having the qualifications or meeting the requirements of holding that position? And why?

Further,

Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a “lawyer”. He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he “fibbed” on his bar application.

2. Michelle Obama “voluntarily surrendered” her law license in 1993.

3. So, we have the President and First Lady – who don’t actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.

4. A senior lecturer is one thing. A fully ranked law professor is another. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, “Obama did NOT ‘hold the title’ of a University of Chicago law school professor”. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) “served as a professor” in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

These are highly disturbing facts, verified facts from the people who know at the Chicago Law School.

There is more from Ross, however:

6. “He did not hold the title of professor of law,” said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the U.S. Constitution recently during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video.

9. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: “We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in ourConstitution: the notion that we are all created equal.”

10. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?

When you are a phony it’s hard to keep facts straight.

Obama has made sure that all of his records are sealed tight. And apart from the courageous souls at the various educational institutions who dared to speak the truth, the schools Obama claimed to attend unanimously refuse to release transcripts, records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama’s presence in their institutions.

BREAKING DEVELOPMENT–just as these disturbing facts come to light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals with numerous ‘journalists,’ promising unprecedented access to the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain information ‘they may discover.’


Oh, so who is dangerous?

by admin ~ March 31st, 2010


test

by admin ~ March 27th, 2010

test


Tools ‹ The Truth is Stranger Than Fiction — WordPress

by admin ~ February 22nd, 2010

Tools ‹ The Truth is Stranger Than Fiction — WordPress.

Holier than thou Representatives of the “Religeon of Peace” dig Strip Clubs, Prostitutes and Flogging Christians for Indecencey

by admin ~ November 28th, 2009

What’s good for the goat humper is not good for the gander…

(Khartoum, Sudan) Over a period of merely 90 minutes, a 16-year-old
Christian girl, Silva Kashif, was arrested, tried, convicted, sentenced
and flogged under sharia law for wearing a short skirt. She received 50 lashes for the crime of offending public morality.

Reportedly, the skirt hung between the knee and ankle and was quite
appropriate in Kashif’s community. However, the Sudanese Islamic
morality police thought differently.

Whereas the Al-Qaeda imam who was in contact with the Fort Hood jihadist was regularly soliciting prostitutes.

The probe of the 9/11 attacks soon led Washington FBI agents back to San Diego, where they found that al-Awlaki had twice been busted for soliciting prostitutes in 1996 and 1997 but had avoided jail time.
Al-Awlaki has previously described these charges as “bogus.” But FBI
agents hoped al-Awlaki might cooperate with the 9/11 probe if they
could nab him on similar charges in Virginia. FBI sources say
agents observed the imam allegedly taking Washington-area prostitutes
into Virginia and contemplated using a federal statute usually reserved
for nabbing pimps who transport prostitutes across state lines.
But
in March 2002, al-Awlaki abruptly left the country for Yemen. “When he
left town, it was as if the air went out of the balloon,” says one FBI
source. Al-Awlaki briefly returned to the United States in October
2002, but federal authorities did not have sufficient cause to detain
him, even though his name popped up on a terrorist “lookout” database.
Now he’s back in the Middle East, where FBI agents are said to be
keeping their eyes on him.

Via Jawa Report

Media Bias

by admin ~ November 4th, 2009

This morning, CNN’s reporting on the convicted rapist’s and the grizzly discovery at his house of up to twelve bodies now. In reporting the story, CNN feels it’s necessary to include the fact he was once a Marine. Is it a fact? Yes. Is it reportable? Yes–but what is the purpose of the tidbit in the story? Only they can answer it and the ‘test’ for bias in this case is the ‘how’ FOX news will report it.

Been drinkin…

by admin ~ October 28th, 2009

Nobody’s readin…..but hey, I dont have to write anything special about no analysis….Obama kiss my ass.

Back onine and blogging–

by admin ~ October 27th, 2009

But who’s afoot to read?